support all operators on all types

[0x777]

So far we've been explicitly supporting types and their operators. This is not a scalable approach, we should instead support all operators from pg_catalog.pg_operator.

[0x777]

Related #625, #1079

[pronevich]

Is it going some progress on this issue? Just want to know, because of the need to use ltree module

[0x777]

@pronevich We will pick this up soon. Can you help us by providing a few examples of the necessary operators and how they should be in graphql?

[litchfield]

@0x777 Easy win here would be to support ltree type using the existing graphql lt/lte/etc. This would cover the basic operators <, <=, =, >=, >. We're starting a major new project and would love this! Where do we sign for a paid plan? :-)

Full support with all the operators supported by GIST indexes <, <=, =, >=, >, @>, <@, @, ~, ? would be amazing though!

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ltree.html#LTREE-OP-TABLE

[roycastro]

@0x777 is ltree support being actively developed? Can you give some feedback at this point?
By the way, great job with Hasura!!!

[tirumaraiselvan]

@pronevich @litchfield @roycastro Will appreciate using #625 for discussing ltree specific support.

[magick93]

Just realized that Hasura doesnt support all pg operators.

And there hasnt been any updates to this issue in 2 years.

Thats very concerning. Is full support of Postgres no longer a priority?

[soupi]

This issue is already addressed in the new Hasura V3 ndc-postgres, hence closing this. Please follow the guide here for Alpha access to Hasura V3.