Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No much performance difference between SAMed and SAMed_h on my own dataset #48

Open
maosuli opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@maosuli
Copy link

maosuli commented May 15, 2024

Thanks for your code. However, I found that there existed less performance difference between SAMed and SAMed_h for my own dataset.

May I know how to fine-tune the parameters to improve the performance of SAMed_h? Shall I change the rank of LoRA adaptation?

Best,

Eric

@luobendewugong
Copy link

Thanks for your code. However, I found that there existed less performance difference between SAMed and SAMed_h for my own dataset.

May I know how to fine-tune the parameters to improve the performance of SAMed_h? Shall I change the rank of LoRA adaptation?

Best,

Eric

Hello, I noticed that you have trained using your own dataset. Could you please advise me on how to convert my own dataset into training and testing datasets usable for Samed? Thank you very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants