Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions about the accuracy of the base task #1

Open
ShiWuxuan opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Questions about the accuracy of the base task #1

ShiWuxuan opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ShiWuxuan
Copy link

Hi Chunwei,

Your work is wonderful and has been very rewarding for me. But I have a slight doubt as to how your method achieves amazing accuracy when learning the underlying task on three datasets. In particular, on ImageNet-Subset, the accuracy of the initial 50 classes can be close to 100% (from Figure 7 it is estimated to be 98%).

Look forward to and thank you for your reply.

@horsepurve
Copy link
Owner

horsepurve commented Feb 17, 2023

Thanks for the question!

The accuracy on the base classes is also higher on CIFAR-100 (5/10/20 phases, Figure 5). This is because:

  1. Training on the base classes is an easier task compared to training on the full classes. There are only ~half of the total classes to distinguish.
  2. Other methods all simply used the out-of-the-box classification result from the network, but here ours involves many "post-processings" like Voronoi subdivision, test-time assignment, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants