-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SA-M strategy #5
Comments
A1: To handle some out-of-bounds cases, the calculation in the code is (distance+1), which can be seen as a normalization processing and has little impact on the performance.
A2: The angle is converted to [0,pi/2] in the calculate processing.
…---- Replied Message ----
| From | ***@***.***> |
| Date | 06/14/2022 10:20 |
| To | ***@***.***> |
| Cc | ***@***.***> |
| Subject | [houliping/SASM] SA-M strategy (Issue #5) |
Hi, I found that the formula for calculating distance in the code is different from that in the paper. Is the effect of using the formula in the code similar to that in the paper? Also,why is the formula for calculating distance different in [0,90] and other angles?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
@houliping |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi, I found that the formula for calculating distance in the code is different from that in the paper. Is the effect of using the formula in the code similar to that in the paper? Also,why is the formula for calculating distance different in [0,90] and other angles?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: