-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
createIssue conflicts with use of issue table as a cache #4
Comments
If I understand you, should I remove the createIssue mutation ? |
As I discussed with @jimscarver, I don't expect any mutations to come in via graphql:
|
Could you please explain the kind of authentication we are talking about ? |
We have to ensure that only votes by coop members are counted. Currently we use OAuth from github and discord: rchain/bounties#413 |
Ok, but I don't think the authentication would be done on this GraphQL server since we are not doing any mutations ? Only queries to existing data. |
It would be more clear that we're not doing any mutations if the |
Yeah, I'll remove it (and every other mutation)... |
fixed in d2d57b3 |
The
issue
table is just a cache of data from github. Unless thiscreateIssue
mutation is going to push the change all the way to github, it makes no sense.https://github.com/ibesoft11/graphql/blob/658a47c21bed87c7f36b7bd50c25f3e24e5745dc/schemaResolver.js#L30
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: