Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 18, 2023. It is now read-only.

[DNNL] The labels are incorrect for squeezeNet(OpenVINO) #866

Open
Christywl opened this issue Jun 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

[DNNL] The labels are incorrect for squeezeNet(OpenVINO) #866

Christywl opened this issue Jun 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working p2 Second priority

Comments

@Christywl
Copy link
Contributor

Test Env:
Chromium Version: nightly build 75.0.3739.0 (f456c6d)
Platform: Linux/Windows/macOS

Expected Result:
The labels should be correct.

Actual Result:
The labels are incorrect for squeezeNet(OpenVINO):

SqueezeNet(OpenVINO)

How to Reproduce:

  1. Setup test server and start
  2. Visit http://localhost:8080/examples/image_classification
  3. Select FAST_SINGLE_ANSWER
  4. Select squeezeNet(OpenVINO)
@Christywl Christywl added bug Something isn't working p2 Second priority labels Jun 19, 2019
@pinzhenx
Copy link
Contributor

This might be an issue in the softmax. If we bypass the softmax, i.e. set SOFTMAX under mkldnn to False, and enable dual-backend, say WASM + FAST, then it works fine.

@pinzhenx
Copy link
Contributor

pinzhenx commented Jun 19, 2019

It seems that it’s the input shape of the softmax that leads to the wrong results: [1,1000] is ok but not the [1,1,1,1000].

#884

@Christywl Christywl changed the title [MKLDNN] The labels are incorrect for squeezeNet(OpenVINO) [DNNL] The labels are incorrect for squeezeNet(OpenVINO) Apr 10, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working p2 Second priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants