Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump CHaP and remove ekg-json s-r-p #4519

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2022

Conversation

michaelpj
Copy link
Contributor

I had to fix a few things, especially adding some constraints that should be in upstream packages. We can fix those with revisions once we get those working.

@michaelpj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Got rid of the one for ekg-forward too.

@michaelpj
Copy link
Contributor Author

@newhoggy maybe you could take a look?

Copy link
Contributor

@andreabedini andreabedini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@michaelpj
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r+

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
4519: Bump CHaP and remove `ekg-json` s-r-p r=michaelpj a=michaelpj

I had to fix a few things, especially adding some constraints that should be in upstream packages. We can fix those with revisions once we get those working.

Co-authored-by: Michael Peyton Jones <[email protected]>
@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented Oct 13, 2022

Timed out.

@michaelpj
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r+

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
4519: Bump CHaP and remove `ekg-json` s-r-p r=michaelpj a=michaelpj

I had to fix a few things, especially adding some constraints that should be in upstream packages. We can fix those with revisions once we get those working.

Co-authored-by: Michael Peyton Jones <[email protected]>
@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented Oct 13, 2022

Build failed:

@michaelpj
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r+

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
4519: Bump CHaP and remove `ekg-json` s-r-p r=michaelpj a=michaelpj

I had to fix a few things, especially adding some constraints that should be in upstream packages. We can fix those with revisions once we get those working.

Co-authored-by: Michael Peyton Jones <[email protected]>
@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented Oct 13, 2022

This PR was included in a batch that successfully built, but then failed to merge into master. It will not be retried.

Additional information:

{"message":"Waiting on code owner review from deepfire, denisshevchenko, fmaste, jutaro, and/or mgmeier.","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/articles/about-protected-branches"}

@michaelpj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, apparently John is not good enough despite being listed as a codeowner? I'm confused.

@michaelpj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Um, maybe @deepfire ?

@disassembler
Copy link
Contributor

bors r+

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2022
4519: Bump CHaP and remove `ekg-json` s-r-p r=disassembler a=michaelpj

I had to fix a few things, especially adding some constraints that should be in upstream packages. We can fix those with revisions once we get those working.

Co-authored-by: Michael Peyton Jones <[email protected]>
@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented Oct 17, 2022

This PR was included in a batch that successfully built, but then failed to merge into master. It will not be retried.

Additional information:

{"message":"Waiting on code owner review from deepfire, denisshevchenko, fmaste, jutaro, and/or mgmeier.","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/articles/about-protected-branches"}

@disassembler
Copy link
Contributor

bors r+

@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented Oct 17, 2022

Build succeeded:

@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot merged commit df1dea5 into IntersectMBO:master Oct 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants