Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch coverage to codecov from coveralls #3473

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 6, 2016

Conversation

Kubuxu
Copy link
Member

@Kubuxu Kubuxu commented Dec 6, 2016

It works, coveralls stopped suddenly. It has also much nicer UI and more config options.

Still WIP, I will comment when it is ready.

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sztandera <[email protected]>
As otherwise we loose .git directory which is required for Coveralls to
report Coverage properly.

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sztandera <[email protected]>
@Kubuxu Kubuxu added the status/in-progress In progress label Dec 6, 2016
@Kubuxu Kubuxu force-pushed the feat/cover/maybe-better branch 2 times, most recently from 4612400 to ac37144 Compare December 6, 2016 20:54
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 6, 2016

Current coverage is 34.30% (diff: 100%)

No coverage report found for master at 6bcca84.

Powered by Codecov. Last update 6bcca84...89e46dc

@Kubuxu
Copy link
Member Author

Kubuxu commented Dec 6, 2016

After this build passes on CircleCI it should be ready.

Comments will be disabled once we merge it to master (config file).

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 6, 2016

Comments will be disabled once we merge it to master (config file).

Will it use the github PR status then? I think it's important to show a big red flag if coverage decreases with a PR.

@Kubuxu
Copy link
Member Author

Kubuxu commented Dec 6, 2016

Yes, once CircleCI goes through the build status for coverage will be shown.

Disabling comments was required by @whyrusleeping

@Kubuxu
Copy link
Member Author

Kubuxu commented Dec 6, 2016

The last few patches also might have to be in master. If not, I will work a bit more to get it to work.

@whyrusleeping should be good to merge.'

EDIT: Wait for few minutes, I might have an idea.

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sztandera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sztandera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sztandera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sztandera <[email protected]>
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping merged commit 90d6ab0 into master Dec 6, 2016
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping deleted the feat/cover/maybe-better branch December 6, 2016 23:09
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping removed the status/in-progress In progress label Dec 6, 2016
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants