-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 324
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add an indicator to show that resources have been loaded over IPFS #662
Comments
Subresource requests are easy to detect: I agree, UX will be the tricky to get right, especially on Chromium browsers where it is not possible to show What if we stop displaying peer count on the badge, and instead show the number of redirected resources on current page? (if any) |
Revisiting this one with the idea that we can probably accomplish this without removing the "number of peers" indicator. The below sketch:
Note that this scheme makes the Firefox address bar indicator a duplication of info, so I've removed it ... this also means greater consistency between browsers 😊 @lidel, any thoughts? |
I like the stroke version for "off" and aqua stroke for "on, but current tab had no resources loaded from IPFS", but at the same time worry that this aqua stroke would be shown for the most of the time as people browse regular internet without IPFS resources, effectively replacing the cube as default companion icon. I think we could use "aqua stroke" as indicator for "redirect to local gateway disabled globally/for this host" state, but we are lacking good way of distinguishing between "online, redirect enabled" vs "online, redirect enabled, and we loaded some stuff from local node". Here's an idea: use regular cube, but change the meaning of the badge count, and make it "the number of resources loaded from IPFS for the current tab". Would that work? |
@lidel I'd be a bit concerned about changing the meaning of that number after a few years of it meaning something else -- users would assume their number of available peers had gone way down with no reason, unless they read the release notes. I'd suggest running a survey to learn more from users, but unfortunately at the moment we're sort of inundating users with surveys ... we could hold off for a while on this if we wanted to go that route. Is it necessarily a bad thing if the stroke icon is a somewhat-default until more IPFS-resourced sites exist in the wild? |
Tough one 🤔 Note that we need to remove peer count anyway, as constant updates are expensive (#721, #721 (comment)). What if we:
ps. I realized we may have a problem with stroke version for "off" in dark modes. Current "off" works pretty well in both light and dark contexts: ps2. we could also display https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs-companion/releases/latest after each update |
Oh, that is a HUGE bummer about removing peer count -- thanks for alerting me to those discussions, I hadn't been tracking that conversation. Sample set of one, but I've leaned pretty heavily on the peer count icon ... There was earlier discussion about bringing peer count into the Desktop cube menu (the dropdown, not the cube itself). Do we want to wake that back up again as at least a reasonably convenient way of offering that indicator when we strip it out of Companion? +1 to opening the GH latest-release page on upgrade; had been wanting that anyway. I'll open a separate issue for that. (Note this means we'll have to be pretty intentional about how we write release notes -- probably a TLDR at the top of what's user-impacting, followed by our usual changelog.) Agree with your recommendations above with the tooltip and repeating the count in the main menu. The count would fit nicely into the "Current Tab" menu header (particularly since there's nothing interactive in it, just informative). Regarding dark mode: can we detect and change icon accordingly, or is that too much trouble? |
I thought the same, but then I mostly rely on the color of the icon (is the node on/off) – unsure if knowing how many peers you have is that crucial. If we introduce have HALF-ON icon to represent "node is on, but has no peers", we could remove peer count without functional regression.
Should be enough to have "peer count" in companion browser action menu.
Sadly no, no universal way to solve dark mode dynamically: That is the main reason why we were stuck with current "off" icon for so long – its "good enough" in both light and dark. |
@lidel, thanks for the clarification re light/dark mode -- let's keep the existing off state icon, then. I'm struggling with how to convey one extra state for "on but no peers" without introducing too much visual complexity. We could throw an alert triangle With that in mind, I believe the below illustration covers all the points mentioned above: four states (off, on+no redirects, on+redirects, on+redirects+loading stuff), plus more granular hover text for the cube icon and an indicator in the menu (next to "Current Tab") for how many resources, if any, are loaded. Hover text for the cube icon would change accordingly based on the state, something like:
Question: What happens to the badge when a tab is loading more than 999 resources? "1.2k"? Related: ipfs/ipfs-desktop#1599 would display peer count in Desktop tray/cube menu, both as a hover on the cube icon (for those who have it) and in the menu itself. Understood this doesn't help folks who aren't running Desktop, but it's a value add for those who are. |
I think that is a very good summary, thank you @jessicaschilling ! I'd like us to have the indicator you mentioned, but would avoid What if we set the badge value to
AFAIK badge is "4 characters or less", so 1000 would display just fine. |
@lidel Great idea on just inserting a badge value. I might go for Regarding other options: (edit: What about changing the color of the badge? Too prominent?) I'm afraid implementation is getting a little out of my depth for this one. Happy to work together with you and/or @rafaelramalho19 if we want to prioritize this ... I might suggest we ship this prior to any bumps in user numbers due to pinning services etc, because this work is going to change an existing visual pattern. Thoughts? |
We can experiment with it, as long we get similar results in all browsers.
Agreed. I'd like to pick this up after #811 (hoping to finish that PR this/next week). |
I think that's all I need for now, thank you! Will see if anything comes up during implementation 👍 |
Expected: There should be an indicator to show that some resources on the current page have been loaded over IPFS. The page is loaded over HTTPS but some static assets are served from an DNSLink enabled subdomain.
Actual: There is no visual indicator.
Notes: I'd normally suggest fixing up the pageAction icon, but browser support for pageAction isn't all that great compared to browserAction. Maybe just change the color of the browserAction icon? Attaching a green version for this purpose.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: