You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have issues with the names of the parameters, some of which are not explicit (or could be misleading, without reading the documentation). Mostly it is:
instrument_ant_number: this is intended to refer to the number of antenna, where one can expect to get the number of the antenna in use. I suggest to replace with instrument_ant_count, which makes it fully explicit.
instrument_feed: this is intended to refer to the number of antenna feed, whereas I would expect a antenna feed name with such a name. May be replace by instrument_feed_count?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think most, if not all, of the instrument_xxx parameters should be removed from the standard. These parameters are mostly meaningless unless you're doing an instrument-specific query.
We agree that instrument_xxx would be used for more advanced discovery. For instance instrument_ant_count could be of interest in the case of split array observations, when the user wants to select only those observations involving at least a given number of stations.
I have issues with the names of the parameters, some of which are not explicit (or could be misleading, without reading the documentation). Mostly it is:
instrument_ant_number
: this is intended to refer to the number of antenna, where one can expect to get the number of the antenna in use. I suggest to replace withinstrument_ant_count
, which makes it fully explicit.instrument_feed
: this is intended to refer to the number of antenna feed, whereas I would expect a antenna feed name with such a name. May be replace byinstrument_feed_count
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: