Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
359 lines (289 loc) · 16.9 KB

CONTRIBUTING.rst

File metadata and controls

359 lines (289 loc) · 16.9 KB

Writing Documentation for ownCloud

In order to improve ownCloud's documentation, the documentation repository has been created. This allows everyone to contribute. Even though or particularly because it is now a lot easier to contribute to documentation, it is important that everyone obeys certain principles

  1. in terms of technicalities, such as dealing with Git, learning reStructuredText, etc.
  2. in terms of writing the actual documentation, i.e. writing style, choosing examples, structuring new texts, etc.

Getting Started with the Documentation Repository

You have two basic choices, editing the manual directly on GitHub, or checking out the sources. If you want to use direct editing, please make sure to pick "stable45" (or whatever the latest stable branch is) from the branch selector before proceeding. If you want to check out the documentation locally, follow these steps:

  1. Check out git://github.com/owncloud/documentation

  2. Select the branch that you want to edit. Check out the Policy section to know which branch is right for you. Usually, it's the latest stable branch, i.e. git checkout stable45 if the latest stable ownCloud version is 4.5.

  3. Find the manual you want to edit, pick the correct .rst file and start working. Check the next section about target audiences!

  4. Run "make html" and "make latexpdf" (requires a full LaTeX installation!) to verify you have not broken anything.

  5. Commit your work, if you have write access to ownCloud, or create a pull request otherwise.

  6. If you have committed the work yourself, please merge the result into the master branch:

    git fetch origin
    git checkout master
    git merge origin/stable45 master
    <resolve possible conflicts>
    git add <resolved conflict files>
    git commit
    git push
    

For editing, you will need to learn reStructuredText. It's a simple markup, but it's usually not known by heart, contrary to e.g. HTML. Thus, I recommend printing this RST Cheat Sheet, and keep the reStructuredText Primer as well as the reStructuredText User Documentation in your bookmarks.

Dependencies for Building the Documentation locally

ownCloud documentation uses Sphinx, a Python-based documentation framework. You will need:

  • Python 2.6 or newer
  • Sphinx for Python 2.x (usually part of any Linux distribution or in Mac-Ports)
  • sphinxcontrib-phpdomain (install via pip install sphinxcontrib-phpdomain)
  • texlive-latex (for building PDFs via LaTeX). Debian users need to install texlive-latex-full.

Target Audiences

Admin Manual
This does not only include professional admins, but simply everyone who wishes to setup an ownCloud instance. In case of doubt, make sure to let the reader know about your terminology, at least in the basic chapters. If you are going into the nitty-gritty of fail-over, load-balancing and the like, a bit more tech-literacy can be assumed, but try to provide helpful links nonetheless.
User Manual
This manual describes the Web UI as well as other exposed functionality, such as WebDAV, calendar, etc. It does not include the ownCloud Desktop Client, which has its own manual embedded in its repository.
Developers Manual
Be aware that, depending on the chapter, this can address people who develop the ownCloud core, or those who develop apps using the ownCloud framework. Either way, try to not assume too much knowledge, to ease the learning curve.

Writing Style

Documentation should be concise and to the point, maintaining a consistent style. Here is some advise on what to watch out for when contributing.

Know what you are writing about

While this sounds obvious, this poses a challenge to both novice and professional writers alike, because writing good documentation requires a solid understanding of the problem at hand. However, documentation writers usually only know aspects, i.e. they may be able to use the software, but they are not domain experts. It is an essential part of their job to get in touch with the domain experts to get the big picture, and then write the documentation.

Making sure you have acquired all necessary knowledge is thus essential. Whenever you find yourself writing sentences like "you should know how this works", you are clearly skipping relevant information. This is when you should either try to get more information to describe the information properly, or at least link to a generic problem solution on an external site. A halfhearted documentation is not only unhelpful, it's usually frustrating.

Be honest about what we do not cover yet
The only other box markup allowed in the ownCloud documentation is todo::. If you discover imprecise our out-of-date documentation, add a todo marker describing what is missing, so it can be fixed by doc writing volunteers. Often, these make great Junior Jobs. However, make sure it does not become an ever-growing wish list.
Do not try to sell the product
People reading the documentation are already showing interest and the best way to have them using ownCloud is to help them with their issue on a purely technical level. They will be put off by noisy claims that do not help them. You are not a copy-writer [1], maintain a neutral style.
Avoid redundancy

Consider this part that actually used to be part of the documentation [2]:

Next, choose Basic Server Configuration. As you obviously have guessed by now, this will install the basic configuration of the server.

Not only does this force the reader to parse the anecdotal clause (which does not explain anything): He will either know what this option does, and thus be annoyed by the redundant information, or he will not have guessed it. This reader will not only take offense, but the text also does not teach him what a basic server configuration is, leaving him non the wiser.

Do not write prose
Prefer bullet points over long textual lists for enumeration, do not try to write complicated grammatical constructs. It's better to provide an example and explain its details than describing the problem in an overly abstract way. You are not a poet [1]!
Avoid smileys/emoticons

They usually exhibit an actual or perceived lack of your knowledge on the topic:

You should know how to configure Apache ;-)

They can also be an attempt to inappropriately bond with the user (remember, they seek information, not entertainment. You are not a novelist either [1]!)

We are all too familiar with problems like these ;-)

If you are guiding the user through a scenario, the use of "we" is acceptable. ("Next, we have to pick an appropriate caching strategy"), but should not be overused.

Do not use "don't"
For native speakers this should go without saying: Given the books formal nature, informal wording should not be used. This also includes other abbreviations such as "haven't", "shouldn't", "it's", "that's", etc. Instead, use "do not", "have not", "should not", "it is " "that is" etc. Similarly, avoid street style language, i.e. do not write "u" but "you".
Try to address the reader directly, but do not try to bond too strongly

Indirection, while sometimes elegant, makes a text harder to read:

The upload_max_size directive can be used to define an upper bound for the upload.

Compare this to:

If you want to restrict the upload, use the upload_max_size directive...

which is a lot easier to read. Avoid the first person narration, as it easily creates an author vs reader scenario, like so [2]:

I have not installed the php5-intl extension. You might want to install it.

This creates a subjective perspective, and - more importantly - disguises exactly why the reader might want to install it even though you did not.

Know your reader
Provide documentation with a user story in mind. Try to picture situations in which people might most frequently consult your documentation. This has immediate consequences on the way you are describing things. Picture most Installation scenarios: in a data center, on a home NAS or in an ISP-rented virtual server, advising the user to check the installation by typing http://localhost/owncloud makes no sense. They will most likely not be sitting in front of the server, but test remotely, even though your test installation might in fact be installed locally.
Provide examples
After providing a bit of theory, complex topics should always be accompanied by a meaningful but concise examples. An example is the ideal starting point for further explanation.
Provide schematics
"One Picture is Worth Ten Thousand Words". The more complex the topic, the more people will appreciate being presented with the literal "big picture". Inkscape is a great tool for drawing and exporting schematics. It is a good idea to export both PDF and PNG, since PDF will go better with inside PDF. Let Sphinx decide which format to use by writing Image:: MyImage.*
Provide screenshots
Especially for end user documentation, screenshots are a vital way for readers to match the description with what they see on the screen.
Use figures rather than image tags
Figures (figure::) are special environments that contain images and schematics, rather than image::. Backends like LaTeX will be able to position figures in meaningful places in the PDF version. Use the :ref: instruction to reference them in the text. Figures allow for captions, use them to provide context!
Avoid the Wall of Text
Make use of paragraphs. Paragraphs should be no longer than four sentences. More than five paragraphs in a row indicate a lack of examples, schematics or pictures.
Do not overuse boxes

reStructuredText offers a lot of boxes: Warnings, Notes, etc. You can even define your own! However, this usually leads to an avalanche of boxes, which significantly disturbs the reading flow. Thus, only use the note:: markup when you really want to point out odd behavior. Avoid warning:: and other markups. the note markup should be indicative of something special. Otherwise, try to keep the reader in his text flow, e.g.:

... for the Apache web server, you should use a .htaccess file. .. note:: .htaccess files are specific to Apache and usually will not work on other web servers.

this is better written as:

... for the Apache web server, you should use a .htaccess file. In case you are not using apache, the section :ref: Web Server Notes will explain how to implement alternatives to this Apache-proprietary way of securing your data directory.
Do not overuse headings
If you find yourself requiring fourth or fifth-level headings, you are probably doing something wrong. Headings are a great way to structure a chapter or section before you start to fill them with content, but you should reconsider their necessity if you find yourself nesting too much or if lots of headings guard a single paragraph.
Wrap your text at 80 characters
This makes markup like reStructuredText a lot easier to read. Most editors have support for this. Given the sheer amount of preferred text editors, the most effective way to figure out how to set this up is an online search, which will reveal tips such as the answers to this stackoverflow question.
Be consistent about numbers
Single digits (0-9) should be written out ("In a Scenario involving two servers..."). For the rest, use numerals ("This solution will scale up to 1000 concurrent users"). However, stay consistent when you need use single and multi-digit numbers to refer to the same subject in a sentence: "This clustering solution scales up from 2 to 20 servers". In case of doubt, refer to the full grammar rule set on writing numbers.
Use title case sentences for headings
This means that headings should obey to the following rules [3]:
  1. Capitalize the first word of the title/heading and of any subtitle/subheading.
  2. Capitalize all "major" words (nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, and pronouns) in the title/heading, including the second part of hyphenated major words (e.g., Self-Report not Self-report).
  3. Capitalize all words of four letters or more.

Consider the following heading:

Hardening ownCloud for secure deployment

This should be written as:

Hardening ownCloud for Secure Deployment
Check your spelling

Always. No exceptions, no excuses. Everything has a built-in spell checker these days.

Check for stray and trailing spaces A git diff will reveal them, as will most editors, if set up correctly. This page describes how to set up vim to spot unwanted spaces.

Find a human reviewer

This can be any person within the community, or a person familiar with the topic. Let them try to comprehend what you just wrote. If they don not get it, an average user most likely will not either. A reviewer will also spot grammar errors, which the spell checker can not usually catch.

Ideally, we would even have editors. Note that an editor does a lot more than reviewing. He will do rewrites, style sanitation, consistency checks, etc. Unfortunately, we so far (at the time of writing) do not have any volunteering professional writers who could serve as editors, so we all need to make sure that at least the style is consistent. This is especially important when you are adding content to existing documentation.

That is it. If you are looking for further inspiration on good writing style, check the FAQ in the next section. Thank you for improving the ownCloud documentation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What should I look at as a reference for good documentation style?
The Sphinx documentation itself is very good. Every page has a "Show source" section that shows how it was typeset. Another great example is the Subversion Book.
I need to create a new chapter, should I create chapter.rst or chapter/index.rst?
Do not create a directory. We can still re-factor into a directory later on. If you are sitting on a huge pile of documentation on a single topic, we will be glad to assist. Please send a mail to the ownCloud mailinglist
Why not use cherry-picking from master to the stable branch?
Cherry-picking only works if we have someone who makes sure the cherries actually get picked. This also involves adjusting the documentation to stable45, which requires domain specific knowledge of both versions. If you still would like to volunteer, speak up.
LaTeX fails to render my fancy table. What can I do to fix this?
Avoid overly complex tables. Complex tables should usually broken down into simple tables + text anyway. Remember, people might read this on their eBook reader! Everything with multiline columns is something that the LaTeX generator frowns upon. In general though, the LaTeX generator is just a lot more picky over a broken ASCII table art misplacement than the HTML equivalent is. Double-check your markup. If you really need complex tables, consider CSV tables.
I have pushed changes to the documentation repo, what now?
Mr Jenkins will try to build HTML and PDF versions and put them online at the ownCloud doc server. If he fails to build your version, you will receive a mail, please fix it or ask for help on IRC (irc.freenode.net, #owncloud-dev) or the ownCloud mailinglist.
[1](1, 2, 3) For the purpose of editing this documentation anyway.
[2](1, 2) Actual real-life example. Slightly modified to protect the innocent.
[3]As described on the APA style blog.