Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

False positives for TypedDicts #335

Open
alicederyn opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

False positives for TypedDicts #335

alicederyn opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@alicederyn
Copy link

The following code:

class ExampleTypedDict(typing.TypedDict):
  field1: int
  field2: str

Results in unused variable 'field1' (60% confidence) (same for field2).

As this is how TypedDicts are designed to work, probably the correct solution is to special-case them.

@weblab-misha
Copy link

For clarity: typed dicts are used this way:

instance = ExampleTypedDict(field1=1, field2="hello")
assert instance["field1"] == 1
assert instance["field2"] == "hello"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants