Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Website: consider curating sponsors list #7272

Closed
pwcsquared opened this issue Oct 25, 2018 · 5 comments · Fixed by #7286
Closed

Website: consider curating sponsors list #7272

pwcsquared opened this issue Oct 25, 2018 · 5 comments · Fixed by #7286

Comments

@pwcsquared
Copy link

Looking at the site and the CONTRIBUTING.md file, some of the backers and sponsors listed are advertising adult escort services. It looks like the list is being dynamically generated. Consider moderating these lists.

https://github.com/facebook/jest/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sponsors

@newswim
Copy link
Contributor

newswim commented Oct 26, 2018

Here's the place in the code where an additional filter rule could be added:

https://github.com/facebook/jest/blob/master/website/pages/en/index.js#L89

@natealcedo
Copy link

I actually don't think this should be an issue. It is just fair that all sponsors get featured. Just because one doesn't necessarily agree with the work of the sponsor shouldn't be a reason that they do not get featured. I guess in that case maybe there should be a way to prevent sponsorship from said parties if you really don't want their money?

@newswim
Copy link
Contributor

newswim commented Oct 26, 2018

I mean, from the outside it looks like a porn site paying $2 a month for a lot of free publicity.

Sites in question:

Not safe for work

https://www.adultseek.com
https://adultwork.com
https://www.uescort.com

/NFSW

@natealcedo
Copy link

Technically, it's NOT free since they DO pay.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 12, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants