Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Maybe. But this was all implemented before we had extensions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Thank you for the quick response. I completely understand that things happen for historical reasons. It also shows that extensions are a good abstraction, if they allow to reduce the number of options for pandoc. Would it be a huge effort to offer the same functionality as already implemented in https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#math-rendering-in-html via extensions? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
There are several options in pandoc for configuring math rendering in HTML files: https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#math-rendering-in-html
Why are these implemented as pandoc options and not as extensions? What I mean is why is the command to convert to HTML with mathjax support like
instead of
Wouldn't it be more consistent to have math-rendering in HTML configured as extensions instead of options?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions