-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V2 Proposal #55
Comments
Has this library gone dark? Haven't been any updates for about 6 months? |
I'd would say it is stable... :) As soon as I have some time, I'll work on 2.0. |
:) Yes, definitely stable! I was mainly wondering because of some issues I had been following to see if there were any updates or if there were going to be. It wasn't anything major. Just an edge case around ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException being thrown. We can work around it though. Thanks! |
Mind opening an issue for this |
There was one already that I thought you had fixed, but I was waiting for a
new release. It doesn't look like there was one.
#45
…On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Tercio Gaudencio Filho < ***@***.***> wrote:
Mind opening an issue for this ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#55 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABql-N_-Wqv3a6R3pgv19f1fW5O7Qcmwks5t1VSYgaJpZM4SXN7i>
.
|
It was issued... 1.0.3. Maybe this is another bug... |
Any chance of being able to accept |
what happened with v2? still not released... |
ping |
@fanweixiao yes |
Hi everyone. Sorry for the long delay, I'm quite busy here. I believe a v2 is a must, I'll try to work it out next week. Any new requirements? |
@0x3333 Can it be merged? |
I’m not working with hashids anymore. Take a look at https://github.com/sqids/sqids-java |
hashids supports custom secret, which sqids cannot do |
"Secret" or "salt" was a misnomer.
|
Version 2.0 Proposal
This issue will be a discussion point to exchange ideas about version 2.0.
Big picture
The community is urging for a more java idiom version, and the current version can't handle these changes, that's why I'm proposing a new version, incorporating all the needs from the community in a broad discussion.
What about v2?
The new version must be compatible with original implementation as much as it can, without sacrificing java idiom. We will discuss how it will be implemented and the design considerations will be made here.
@cazacugmihai Proposal
@iggymoran Proposal
@KangoV Proposal
Reference implementation PR #53.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: