You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I read your new glioblastoma paper and would like to try your methods on our single-cell RNA-seq data.
But I have the following concerns.
What is the differences between this package and infercnv? Intuitively, I found infercnv is much more complicated.
When using infercna(), can I pool all samples (different tumors) together? Or it should be applied to individual sample? Since Figure 1A in your paper show all samples in one heatmap, I guess you put all cells in one matrix, is that true? I do not know if pooling different tumors is a good way, as inter-tumor heterogeneity may influence the results.
Did you use refCells in analyzing the glioblastoma data? Or you classify malignant cells and non-malignant cells by combining CNA signal and CNA correlation? In the method "CNA inference from single-cell data", it said cells were classified by CNA signal and CNA correlation, but the upper panel in Figure 1A shows the CNA levels of non-malignant cells. So, I am confused.
It would be highly appreciated if you could give me some hints. I am new to single-cell data analysis.
Best wishes,
Yiwei Niu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Laffy,
I read your new glioblastoma paper and would like to try your methods on our single-cell RNA-seq data.
But I have the following concerns.
What is the differences between this package and infercnv? Intuitively, I found infercnv is much more complicated.
When using
infercna()
, can I pool all samples (different tumors) together? Or it should be applied to individual sample? Since Figure 1A in your paper show all samples in one heatmap, I guess you put all cells in one matrix, is that true? I do not know if pooling different tumors is a good way, as inter-tumor heterogeneity may influence the results.Did you use
refCells
in analyzing the glioblastoma data? Or you classify malignant cells and non-malignant cells by combining CNA signal and CNA correlation? In the method "CNA inference from single-cell data", it said cells were classified by CNA signal and CNA correlation, but the upper panel in Figure 1A shows the CNA levels of non-malignant cells. So, I am confused.It would be highly appreciated if you could give me some hints. I am new to single-cell data analysis.
Best wishes,
Yiwei Niu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: