You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, these tools aim to map related variables across schema versions of a form. It would be great to have a meaningful way to map related variables across forms.
for example, total contributions is in both the 990 and 990 EZ (totcntrbs, totcntrbgfts), would be great to have a mapping somewhere that combines these into a single variable.
Could be done as a different model or other means. Happy to think through if this makes sense to do and, if it does, how to do it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey @bcipolli thanks for noting this. I definitely agree that this should be done, and have some thoughts, but the short version is this: if a "correct" set of names existed--one that used the same name across forms--it could be added as an extra column in variables.csv.
've contributed a little to the master concordance file -- which is attempting to do this--and my hope is to cross-reference it with irsx via xpaths, but haven't done much on this lately (and am pretty jammed up on time until early next year).
Currently, these tools aim to map related variables across schema versions of a form. It would be great to have a meaningful way to map related variables across forms.
for example, total contributions is in both the 990 and 990 EZ (totcntrbs, totcntrbgfts), would be great to have a mapping somewhere that combines these into a single variable.
Could be done as a different model or other means. Happy to think through if this makes sense to do and, if it does, how to do it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: