Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 28, 2017. It is now read-only.

Submit for SLIP #12

Open
mdedetrich opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Submit for SLIP #12

mdedetrich opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@mdedetrich
Copy link
Contributor

What are peoples thoughts on submitting this to SLIP (i.e. https://github.com/scala/slip). If it manages to get incorporated as a stdlib, it would greatly help improve the adoption

@eed3si9n
Copy link

eed3si9n commented Oct 8, 2015

It might make sense to aim for the Scala modules like scala-parser-combinators, so it's still opt-in.
In general though, the purpose of this project (zero dependency, common AST, long term bincompat) aligns well with Scala Library or its module friends.

@mdedetrich
Copy link
Contributor Author

SLIP created at scala/slip#28

@jrudolph
Copy link
Contributor

jrudolph commented Nov 5, 2015

An alternative route would be to first get adoption and then have a SLIP discussion.

@SethTisue
Copy link

There's no time limit on SLIPs. It seems likely, given the reaction so far, that at the meeting next week we'll decide to make the SLIP official (give it a number, add it to the SLIP list, and encourage it to move forward — with no decision yet on the final outcome, of course!), but also put it on hold until at least some of the major JSON library authors are on board.

Still, I think having the SLIP draft out there, and the official encouragement of the SLIP committee behind it, could help focus people's efforts and drive adoption, so we're glad this is happening. (Thank you, @mdedetrich.)

@mdedetrich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks heaps for the help @SethTisue. Just letting you know that a lot of the major JSON library/web framework authors were on board, but I suppose it depends on what you mean by "on board". Some said they were happy to support it, others said they would adopt it in the next major release and others were indifferent (not intentionally, it was a draft proposal for a while). Actually went out of my way hunting down the various authors.

I think that one of the good things that would come from it becoming an SLIP is that people (particularly library authors) will start taking it seriously. Have finally gotten some very good feedback from the SLIP pull request which I didn't get before

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants