- Wrapping is 80 characters for top-level messages.
- Wrap everything else to 80 characters or 100, depending
- Prefer to wrap lines to 80 characters
- It is OK to go over 80, but less than 100, if it makes the
text clearer and easier to read.
- This SHOULD be rare, however.
- If you have links or tags, wrapping at 100 characters for clarity is acceptable.
- We choose 80 characters here to work better in reviews because Github comment boxes are limited to roughly 80 characters width. The primary "code" interaction with proto files and markdown files is in review. Also, some markdown processors struggle with longer lines.
- Use HTML tags where appropriate, but stick to markdown as much as possible.
- Use blank lines (with
*
prefix) for paragraph breaks in message or enum declarations, regardless of where defined.- Use
<p>
tags for fields, and no "empty" lines (it breaks the tables). - For messages (including
enum
orservice
messages), we prefer to use blank lines exclusively, and not use a<p>
tag.
- Use
- We use line breaks (
<br/>
) in several areas of the specification text. All such line breaks should be placed at the end of the prior line, and should not be placed alone on a line, in the middle of a line, or at the beginning of a line. - Certain elements (headings, code blocks, lists, etc...) are "block" elements
in markdown and HTML. Such elements should not be followed by either
a break (
<br/>
) or paragraph (<p>
) tag (or equivalent markdown). - Use formal US-English spelling and grammar to the maximum extent possible.
- Write proper and complete sentences, avoid partial sentences and unnecessary abbreviations.
- Do not use partial words (e.g. instead of "spec" write "specification").
- Explain all acronyms on first use in a document.
- Use "Hedera Consensus Service(HCS)" the first time "HCS" is written but "HCS" may be used thereafter.
- Extremely common acronyms (e.g. RAM or LASER) do not need to be expanded.
For the purposes of specification document comments, only, the following protocol buffer "types" are considered equivalent.
- Message
service
enum
- Field
rpc
Equivalent types require equivalent specification, so aservice
should be specified using the same guidelines as amessage
orenum
. Arpc
should be specified using the same guidelines as a "field".
- The first line of each document block is "what is this", and should be a
single sentence. Examples: "An identifier for an account." or
"A
tokenTransfer
transaction request body.".- Avoid "this is a thing" (or shorter "thing") type sentences,
write "A thing" instead.
- This applies for the first sentence only, not elsewhere. The first sentence is a "what is this" answer, not full description and mostly just translates from "code" syntax to plain English.
- Minimize detail here, qualifiers, usage, etc... belong in the brief
description or requirements, not here.
- A good rule of thumb is that if this first sentence exceeds 60 characters, then it is trying to describe too much.
- Avoid "this is a thing" (or shorter "thing") type sentences,
write "A thing" instead.
- An optional description may be added to any field or message.
- Include a line break (
<br/>
) after the first line, then a brief description, if appropriate.- Not every field needs additional description,
but nearly all
message
blocks do. - Descriptions may be detailed, but should not include internal
implementation details or requirements. The description should be
detailed enough to explain to an external contributor what the
message or field contains, where it fits within the overall network
system, and why it is needed.
- This is a long-term goal; we have a long way to go to get to this
level of description. Every PR to change
.proto
files should seek to improve the documentation for that file.
- This is a long-term goal; we have a long way to go to get to this
level of description. Every PR to change
- Avoid describing what must, should, must not, or should not be sent, or how the field values affect output. Those items belong in the requirements, instead.
- Not every field needs additional description,
but nearly all
- Include a line break (
- After a paragraph break (a blank line for messages), one requirement per
line. Use break tags at the end of each requirement except the last.
- In field comments a
<p>
tag is required for paragraph breaks. Blank lines break the automated documentation generator in fields because fields are output as markdown tables, and markdown tables require each row to be a single long line.
- In field comments a
- Be prescriptive in requirements. Do not describe the behavior.
- Declare what MUST be done for valid inputs, and what SHALL be present in valid outputs (or in state messages).
- Declare what SHALL happen as a result of a successful, or failed, transaction.
- The word
will
usually meansSHALL
orMUST
. - The word
is
often meansSHALL be
. - Document both positive (
SHALL
orMUST
) and negative (SHALL NOT
orMUST NOT
) requirements. - Avoid "perfect" or "imperfect" verb aspects and "wiggle" words
(might, could, perhaps, etc...).
- The specification items MAY, SHOULD, and RECOMMENDED serve to fill the occasional need for less imperative requirements.
- Also avoid "progressive" verbs (e.g. working, writing, going, deleting).
- Requirements should be short and focused.
- Better to have three separate lines for three items than one longer line with three clauses.
- Duplicating text across lines with slightly different requirements is not only acceptable, but often recommended.
- Well written specification tends to be much more short and clipped sentences than "normal" prose. Some describe the flow as "staccato".
- Required and Optional fields
- The default state for any field is "optional", and all required fields
should be specified as
REQUIRED
. If the presence or absence of a field must be clear separate from the default value of that field, that field should use proto3 "explicit presence" and be marked with theoptional
keyword.
- The default state for any field is "optional", and all required fields
should be specified as
- Add another blank line after requirements for
message
documents only.
- Each message that represents a transaction body must document the
Block Stream effects with a heading
### Block Stream Effects
. - General notes go last, for
message
only, with a heading#### Additional Notes
. - There are cases where description text for a message or field is
exceptionally detailed. In these cases it may be appropriate to
separate broad categories of information with a single horizontal line
(i.e. an
<hr>
tag,---
in markdown). These cases should be quite rare, however; we prefer to avoid the need for such large blocks of specification text. - Line oriented comments (i.e. lines prefixed with
//
) may be used for any comments needed in a proto file that are not intended for API specification. Examples include explaining anoneof
block, or describing why a particular field number or name is reserved.
- Protocol buffers are compiled for the
hedera-services
codebase using a custom processor 'PBJ'. While no other entity is required to usePBJ
, all Hiero protocol buffer files MUST be compatible withPBJ
processing.
Currently, this requires implementing the proposed changes in a branch on thehedera-protobufs
repository, and running the integration test sub-project of thePBJ
project.
- There are some negative patterns present in existing
proto
files. These SHOULD NOT be replicated in new files, when possible.- Older files may use
int64
orint32
when auint
is more appropriate, and document a "non-negative" requirement. This SHOULD NOT be replicated. in new content (files, messages, fields) we SHOULD use unsigned numeric types where appropriate.- We MUST NOT change existing field types without very careful consideration for binary compatibility and impact to clients.
- Older files may use
- Protocol buffer encoding for Hedera MUST be deterministic.
- For this reason `Map' fields CANNOT be used because most protocol buffer implementations are intentionally non-deterministic in serializing and parsing those fields.
- Unknown fields are, likewise, not handled deterministically by most
protocol buffer implementations, so unknown fields MUST NOT be used.
- One exception here is forward compatibility, as implemented in the
PBJ
processor, which is supported in selected scenarios where deterministic behavior is not strictly required.
- One exception here is forward compatibility, as implemented in the
- There are some negative patterns present in existing
proto
files. These SHOULD NOT be replicated in new files, when possible.- Older files have a
package proto;
directive. This is leftover from sample content, and SHOULD NOT be used in new files.- To avoid major compatibility issues, particularly for SDK authors, we
SHOULD NOT change the
package
directive in existing files.
- To avoid major compatibility issues, particularly for SDK authors, we
SHOULD NOT change the
- Older files have a
- For new
proto
files only, the file SHOULD use apackage
directive with a package that is identical to the value in thepbj.java_package
pseudo-directive.- One exception to this guideline is that gRPC
service
andrpc
definitions include the package name in the url path. As a result we cannot easily use full package names for these.- Completely new services and gRPC endpoints SHOULD be defined alone in a
separate
thing_service.proto
file without transaction bodies. The endpoint MAY, then, be defined in a proper package. - Transaction body messages and any component messages SHOULD be defined in a proper package, and references in the gRPC service definition may then use the full package prefix when referring to those messages.
- Completely new services and gRPC endpoints SHOULD be defined alone in a
separate
- The "namespace" behavior of package names is not well supported by PBJ at this time, so packages must be fully specified whenever used.
- One exception to this guideline is that gRPC
/**
* A selection of positive and negative examples
*
* ## Summary and optional description.
* A simple Summary.<br/>
* This example shows recommended structure of summary line and detail
* description, including line length limits.
*
* ## An example for line break placement.
* text ending in a break.<br/>
* is generally easier to read than
* <br/>text starting with a break or
* text that contains<br/>a line break mid-line.
*/
message SampleMessage {
// OneOf does not become an element in the final protobuf, so any
// description needed for oneof blocks must be in "code" comments.
// Such "code" comments are permitted anywhere a comment is permitted,
// but writers should be aware that these comments are not processed and
// remain local to the proto file.
oneof samples {
// We may present "code" level comments, that are not API specification
// wherever needed and appropriate. These comments are not processed
// into documentation, and should be used for information specific to
// the "code" of the protocol buffer definitions, not the API that
// those protocol buffers represent.
/**
* A sample 32-bit integer field.
* <p>
* This block MUST NOT contain a blank line, as fields are presented
* using tables in markdown, so we use a paragraph tag instead.<br/>
* We SHALL separate requirements with a single `<br/>` tag as used
* at the end of the line above.
* <p>
* ### Headings in fields
* We MAY use headings in fields, but it is important to note
* that Javadoc's exceptionally strict view of headings means that
* headings in fields MAY NOT be rendered correctly and MAY cause
* javadoc errors for "out of order" headings.
*/
int32 field_one = 1;
// This field does not require description or specific requirements
// so those are not present. Lack of requirements is very rare indeed,
// so most fields should have a bit more than we see here.
/**
* A simple unsigned 64-bit integer field.
*/
uint64 field_two = 2;
}
}
/**
* A transaction body to add a new consensus node to the network
* address book.<br/>
* This transaction, once complete, enables a new consensus node
* to join the network, and requires governing council authorization.
*
* This transaction body SHALL be considered a "privileged transaction".<br/>
* A `NodeCreateTransactionBody` MUST be signed by the governing council.<br/>
* A `NodeCreateTransactionBody` MUST be signed by the `Key` assigned to the
* `admin_key` field.<br/>
* The newly created node information SHALL be added to the network address
* book information in the network state.<br/>
* The new entry SHALL be created in "state" but SHALL NOT participate in
* network consensus and SHALL NOT be present in network "configuration"
* until the next "upgrade" transaction (as noted below).<br/>
* All new address book entries SHALL be added to the active network
* configuration during the next `freeze` transaction with the field
* `freeze_type` set to `PREPARE_UPGRADE`.
*
* ### Block Stream Effects
* Upon completion the newly assigned `node_id` SHALL be recorded in
* the transaction receipt.<br/>
* This value SHALL be the next available node identifier.<br/>
* Node identifiers SHALL NOT be reused.
*/
/**
* A list of service endpoints for gossip.
* <p>
* These endpoints SHALL represent the published endpoints to which other
* consensus nodes may _gossip_ transactions.<br/>
* These endpoints MUST specify a port.<br/>
* This list MUST NOT be empty.<br/>
* This list MUST NOT contain more than `10` entries.<br/>
* The first two entries in this list SHALL be the endpoints published to
* all consensus nodes.<br/>
* All other entries SHALL be reserved for future use.
* <p>
* Each network may have additional requirements for these endpoints.
* A client MUST check network-specific documentation for those
* details.<br/>
* If the network configuration value `gossipFqdnRestricted` is set, then
* all endpoints in this list MUST supply only IP address.<br/>
* If the network configuration value `gossipFqdnRestricted` is _not_ set,
* then endpoints in this list MAY supply either IP address or FQDN, but
* MUST NOT supply both values for the same endpoint.
*/
Note that this example is all description, there are no requirements listed. This is unusual, but does occur.
/**
* An informational enumeration of all known states.<br/>
* This enumeration is included here So that people know the mapping from
* integer to state "name".<br/>
* State changes are expressed in terms of changes to named states at the
* high level conceptual model of the state type like map key/values or
* queue appends. To say which state the change is on we will include an
* `integer` number for the state name. This is done for performance and
* efficiency as there will be 10s of thousands of state changes in a block.
*
* We use an integer, and provide this enumeration, for the following reasons.
* - If we have a extra 8-10 bytes per state change at 40-50K state changes
* per second then that is an extra 2.5-4 megabits of bandwidth. Compression
* should help a lot but that is not guaranteed.
* - When the state name is used as part of complex key in the big state
* merkle map. The smaller the key is, in bytes, the more efficient the
* database is, because more keys can fit in a single disk page.
* - When parsing keys, parsing a UTF-8 string to a Java String is a many
* times more expensive than parsing a VARINT to an integer.
*
* Note: This enumeration is never transmitted directly in the block stream.
* This enumeration is provided for clients to _interpret_ the value
* of the `StateChange`.`state_id` field.
*/
Note the added block for the "Alias" detail, which specifies some complex behavior that has, historically, caused much confusion.
/**
* A single Account in the Hedera distributed ledger.
*
* Each Account SHALL have a unique three-part identifier, a Key, and one
* or more token balances.<br/>
* Each Account SHALL have an alias, which has multiple forms, and MAY be
* set automatically.<br/>
* Several additional items SHALL be associated with the Account to enable
* full functionality.<br/>
* Assets SHALL be represented as linked-lists with only the "head" item
* referenced directly in the Account, and the remaining items SHALL be
* accessible via the token relation or unique tokens maps.<br/>
* Accounts, as most items in the network, SHALL have an expiration time,
* recorded as seconds since the epoch, and MUST be "renewed" for a small fee
* at expiration. This helps to reduce the amount of inactive accounts retained
* in state.<br/>
* Another account MAY be designated to pay any renewal fees and automatically
* renew an account for (by default) 30-90 days at a time as a means to
* optionally ensure important accounts remain active.<br/>
* Accounts MAY participate in securing the network by "staking" the account
* balances to a particular network node, and receive a portion of network
* fees as a reward. An account MAY optionally decline these rewards but still
* stake its balances.<br/>
* An account MAY optionally require that inbound transfer transactions be
* signed by that account as receiver
* (in addition to the sender's signature).<br/>
* As with all network entities, Account ID SHALL be represented as
* shard.realm.X.<br/>
* Alias and contractId SHALL be additional identifiers used to connect accounts
* to transactions before the account is fully enabled,
* or in EVM contracts.<br/>
*
* ---
*
* #### Alias
* There is considerable complexity with `alias` (aka `evm_address`) for
* Accounts. Much of this comes from the existence of a "hidden" alias for
* almost all accounts, and the reuse of the alias field for both EVM reference
* and "automatic" account creation.
*
* For the purposes of this specification, we will use the following terms for
* clarity.
* - `key_alias` is the account public key as a protobuf serialized message
* and used for auto-creation and subsequent lookup. This is only valid if
* the account key is a
* single `primitive` key, either ED25519 or ECDSA_SECP256K1.
* - `evm_address` exists for every account and is one of
* - `contract_address`, which is the 20 byte EVM contract address per
* EIP-1014
* - `evm_key_address`, which is the keccak-256 hash of a ECDSA_SECP256K1
* `primitive` key.
* - This is for accounts lazy-created from EVM public keys, when the
* corresponding ECDSA_SECP256K1 public key is presented in a
* transaction signed by the private key for that public key, the
* account is created that key assigned, and the protobuf-serialized
* form is set as the account alias.
* - `long_zero`, is a synthetic 20 byte address inferred for "normally"
* created accounts. It is constructed from the "standard" AccountID as
* follows.
* - 4 byte big-endian shard number
* - 8 byte big-endian realm number
* - 8 byte big-endian entity number
*
* The `alias` field in the `Account` message SHALL contain one of four values
* for any given account.
* - The `key_alias`, if the account was created by transferring HBAR to the
* account referenced by `key_alias`.
* - The `evm_key_address` if the account was created from an EVM public key
* - The `contract_address` if the account belongs to an EVM contract
* - Not-Set/null/Bytes.EMPTY (collectively `null`) if the account was
* created normally
*
* If the `alias` field of an `Account` is any form of `null`, then the account
* MAY be referenced by `alias` in an `AccountID` by using the `long_zero`
* address for the account. This "hidden default" alias SHALL NOT be stored,
* but is synthesized by the node software as needed, and may be synthesized by
* an EVM contract or client software as well.<br/>
* An AccountID in a transaction MAY reference an `Account` with
* `shard`.`realm`.`alias`.<br/>
* If the account `alias` field is set for an Account, that value SHALL be the
* account alias.<br/>
* If the account `alias` field is not set for an Account, the `long_zero`
* alias SHALL be the account alias.
*/