Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for json and yaml files #109

Open
ocefpaf opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Add support for json and yaml files #109

ocefpaf opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@ocefpaf
Copy link

ocefpaf commented Jun 7, 2023

Would it make sense to add support for checking json and yaml files in this plugin? Many websites store data (and links) in those format and checking for those would be nice.

@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jun 7, 2023

Thank you for opening your first issue in this project! Engagement like this is essential for open source projects! 🤗

If you haven't done so already, check out Jupyter's Code of Conduct. Also, please try to follow the issue template as it helps other other community members to contribute more effectively.
welcome
You can meet the other Jovyans by joining our Discourse forum. There is also an intro thread there where you can stop by and say Hi! 👋

Welcome to the Jupyter community! 🎉

@d-kleine
Copy link

Would it make sense to add support for checking json and yaml files in this plugin? Many websites store data (and links) in those format and checking for those would be nice.

I think this is a good idea, especially for web development, in general. Personally, I still not quite sure if this is out-of-scope for this package because these formats (.json, .yml/.yaml) will be used for outputs. And there are quite a lot more data base formats (e.g., .xml) out there...

With reference to above suggestion, I would like to request a support for checking Python scripts (.py) as well. Sometimes you have

  • URLs or paths in the code
  • links in the code comments for reference

Would be nice if you could check that too! 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants