Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: autobuild to dockerhub #83

Open
krezreb opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Feature Request: autobuild to dockerhub #83

krezreb opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@krezreb
Copy link
Contributor

krezreb commented Mar 20, 2020

It would be really nice to have an autobuild process that publishes a docker image of the Dockerfile-ca file to dockerhub. This would make deploying a lot easier and faster

@blaggacao
Copy link

blaggacao commented Apr 15, 2020

Specially so as I found it impossible on several ARM models to successfully complete the builds...
I resorted to multi-arch builds and transfer the image. With an official multi arch docker image, that would be a problem no more...

Maybe, first step is to make the tooling multi-arch, so that it's easier to figure out how to cross build the image.

The best resource I found for doing this manually was: https://medium.com/@artur.klauser/building-multi-architecture-docker-images-with-buildx-27d80f7e2408

Resource found for

There is a little elevated container which seems be doing all the qemu related stuff for people who don't want to know the details docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static --reset -p yes referencedin the cited medium article...

@blaggacao
Copy link

Looks like this https://github.com/jitesoft/docker-keybase-sshca is the best "mirror" with aparent arm64/aarch64 support...

@mmou mmou added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants