Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add category grouping option for autocomplete tag dropdown implementation #1321

Open
ibolton336 opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/normal Higher priority than priority/minor. Nice to have. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.

Comments

@ibolton336
Copy link
Member

#1295 (comment)

Address the new grouping option for tag categories. We want to be able to see associated categories that tags belong to in the dropdown as shown in the mockups.

@sjd78
Copy link
Member

sjd78 commented Jun 6, 2024

@rszwajko - Did one of your recent changes cover this issue already?

@rszwajko
Copy link
Collaborator

rszwajko commented Jun 6, 2024

The grouping feature for autocomplete has been added in #1799 but it's not enabled yet. However it should look the same as for the stakeholders here ->

@sjd78 sjd78 added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/normal Higher priority than priority/minor. Nice to have. and removed Custom Assessment Items relating to custom assessment work labels Jun 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/normal Higher priority than priority/minor. Nice to have. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants