You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I used the provided pretrained model, but got AUC=80.1310% on ped2, which is much lower than the AUC reported in the paper(Ours w DPU: 96.9)
I moved the pretrained model (i.e., ped2_model_1000.pth) to folder exp/ped2/log/, and run the command as
I also got the AUC=80.13% with the pre-trained model on Ped2 dataset in the unsupervised setting (Test.py).
However, after training the model on Ped2, I retested after 1000 epochs.
The result is 96.13%.
Note, I used alpha (weight for feature anomaly score) as 0.6. Hope it helps!
I used the provided pretrained model, but got AUC=80.1310% on ped2, which is much lower than the AUC reported in the paper(
Ours w DPU: 96.9
)I moved the pretrained model (i.e.,
ped2_model_1000.pth
) to folderexp/ped2/log/
, and run the command asIs there anything wrong with my procedure? How can I reproduce the result reported in the paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: