Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump RSA key size to 3072-bits to meet German federal BSI Technical Guideline TR-02102-2 #10077

Open
randomvariable opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.

Comments

@randomvariable
Copy link
Member

randomvariable commented Jan 30, 2024

What steps did you take and what happened?

Use kubeadmcontrolplane

What did you expect to happen?

This would have been a feature request, but as of 2024/1/1 this is now a bug. Germany's BSI (Federal Office for Information Security) requires government systems to use at least 3000 bit RSA keys since 2024/1/1. This means that kubeadm cannot meet federal security standards as the 2048-bit RSA key length is hardcoded.

3000+ bit keys are considered good until 2030.

Recommend changing the default to 3072-bits. This should have no impact on existing clusters.

Cluster API version

main / v1.6.1

Kubernetes version

N/A

Anything else you would like to add?

No other deltas with the standard were found.

https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/Publications/TechGuidelines/TG02102/BSI-TR-02102-2.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=10

Label(s) to be applied

/kind bug
One or more /area label. See https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/labels?q=area for the list of labels.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 30, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If CAPI contributors determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@randomvariable
Copy link
Member Author

Kubeadm bug here: kubernetes/kubeadm#3003

@randomvariable
Copy link
Member Author

randomvariable commented Jan 30, 2024

Discussion in Slack suggests that we should provide options rather than change defaults, and encourage people to go to elliptic curve where possible.

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/priority important-longterm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. label Apr 11, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 10, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 10, 2024
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini removed the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Jul 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants