Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document v1alpha1 deprecation timeline #906

Closed
robscott opened this issue Oct 15, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #1128
Closed

Document v1alpha1 deprecation timeline #906

robscott opened this issue Oct 15, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #1128
Assignees
Labels
kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation.
Milestone

Comments

@robscott
Copy link
Member

robscott commented Oct 15, 2021

With v1alpha2 released and v1alpha1 effectively frozen, we should document how long v1alpha1 will continue to exist in this repo. Maybe we should announce deprecation now + the plan to formally remove the API version from the repo in our next minor release (v0.5.0).

A big thanks to @ccfishk for originally raising this in #903 (comment)!

@robscott robscott added the kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. label Oct 15, 2021
@hbagdi
Copy link
Contributor

hbagdi commented Oct 18, 2021

I think we should do two docs update to communicate:

  • v1alpha1 is not going to receive any support, please move to v1alpha2
  • v1alpha1 will be dropped from the repo once v1alpha3 or v1beta1 is released

Mixing minor releases with API version releases is a bit confusing (maybe because that is new?).

@bowei
Copy link
Contributor

bowei commented Oct 18, 2021

There is no such thing as Deprecation for alphas.
Removal of v1alpha1 t doesn't need to wait for an API version to remove.

@robscott
Copy link
Member Author

Mixing minor releases with API version releases is a bit confusing

Yeah I do get that, but I don't think we can always tie removal of API versions with introduction of newer API versions. At some point, there will be no more new API versions to add. I think we're roughly trying to follow Kubernetes versioning guidelines which do include additions and removals of APIs along with minor k8s releases. Unfortunately I'm not seeing any clear upstream documentation for the relationship between API groups/versions and Kubernetes versions (looking at https://kubernetes.io/releases/version-skew-policy/ and https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/release/versioning.md#kubernetes-release-versioning). We likely need clearer documentation around how this works though, at least for Gateway API.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 16, 2022
@robscott
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-lifecycle stale
/assign

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 18, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 18, 2022
@robscott robscott added this to the v1beta1 milestone Apr 18, 2022
@youngnick
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants