Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

access-log: false ignored for auth-url #3040

Closed
stevewolter opened this issue Sep 5, 2018 · 8 comments
Closed

access-log: false ignored for auth-url #3040

stevewolter opened this issue Sep 5, 2018 · 8 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@stevewolter
Copy link

NGINX Ingress controller version: head, 0.13.0

What happened:

When I set these annotations, access logs are written for the endpoint:

nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/enable-access-log: "false"
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/auth-url: "http://foo/bar"

What you expected to happen:

No access logs should be written.

Anything else we need to know:

I suspect that the access logs are written by the second location entry that's created for the auth-url.

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Sep 5, 2018

No access logs should be written.

This works as expected. The annotations are applied to the path of the ingress, not other annotations (like auth-url)

@stevewolter
Copy link
Author

This kind of defeats the purpose of enable-access-log: false for security-sensitive URLs (e.g. when you have to pass authentication information in query strings when the involved software doesn't support Authorization headers). I haven't found a way to inject "access_log: off" into the auth-url handler - should there be one?

@day0ops
Copy link

day0ops commented Nov 23, 2018

@aledbf so whats the way forward for this ?

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Nov 23, 2018

@nixgadget fix the issue in the template checking if the log is disabled inside the auth location

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 21, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Mar 23, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants