Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix #19402: emit proper error in absence of using in given definitions #19714

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2024
Merged

Fix #19402: emit proper error in absence of using in given definitions #19714

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

mazhara
Copy link

@mazhara mazhara commented Feb 17, 2024

No description provided.

@mazhara
Copy link
Author

mazhara commented Feb 17, 2024

CLA signed

anatoliykmetyuk
anatoliykmetyuk approved these changes Feb 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the nice work during the ScalaIO 2024 Nantes Spree @mazhara !

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki merged commit a6df9ca into scala:main Feb 20, 2024
19 checks passed
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.4.2 milestone Mar 28, 2024
@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur mentioned this pull request Jul 1, 2024
Merged
WojciechMazur added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2024
@WojciechMazur
Backport "Fix #19402: emit proper error in absence of using in given …
644bc4f 
…definitions" to LTS (#20929)

Backports #19714 to the LTS branch.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk approved these changes

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki nicolasstucki approved these changes

Assignees

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.4.2
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@mazhara @anatoliykmetyuk @nicolasstucki @Kordyjan @OlgaMazhara-TomTom