Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert broken changes with transparent inline #19922

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki commented Mar 11, 2024

Proposed in #19415 (comment)

Fixes #19415
Fixes #19479

Reverts #18130 and #17924.

#18130 is still closed as it was introduced by #17924.

This reopens #9685

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki merged commit f663a8b into scala:main Mar 12, 2024
19 checks passed
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki deleted the fix-19415 branch March 12, 2024 07:43
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.4.2 milestone Mar 28, 2024
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Reverts parts of scala#19922.

Fixes scala#20342

The logic that we should ignore declared result types of inline methods really only applies
to transparent inlines.
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Reverts parts of scala#19922.

Fixes scala#20342, scala#20297

The logic that we should ignore declared result types of inline methods really only applies
to transparent inlines.
noti0na1 pushed a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request May 14, 2024
Reverts parts of scala#19922.

Fixes scala#20342, scala#20297

The logic that we should ignore declared result types of inline methods really only applies
to transparent inlines.
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
Reverts parts of scala#19922.

Fixes scala#20342, scala#20297

The logic that we should ignore declared result types of inline methods really only applies
to transparent inlines.
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
Reverts parts of scala#19922.

Fixes scala#20342, scala#20297

The logic that we should ignore declared result types of inline methods really only applies
to transparent inlines.
odersky added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2024
Reverts parts of #19922.

Fixes #20342 
Fixes #20297

The logic that we should ignore declared result types of inline methods
really only applies to transparent inlines.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Regression in apache/incubator-pekko-connectors Regression in kalin-rudnicki/harness
3 participants