Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[bug]: lnd does not broadcast closing transaction when sats_per_byte is too low. #8448

Closed
AndresCas123 opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@AndresCas123
Copy link

Background

I have not been able to recover the "limbo balance" from a couple channels that I closed with force option.
The error basically is that LND shows info log with "broadcast failed because of: mempool fee not met: -26: mempool min fee not met, 2562 < 6660".
The channels was moved to pendingchannels but closing transactions is not in the mempool.
Currently status channel: "chan_status_flags": "ChanStatusBorked|ChanStatusCommitBroadcasted|ChanStatusLocalCloseInitiator"

Your environment

  • version of lnd: lncli version 0.16.3-beta commit=v0.16.3-beta
  • Operating system: Linux
  • version of bitcoind: Bitcoin Core version v22.0.0 (release build)

Steps to reproduce

Close a channel with --force option

Expected behaviour

Move channels to pending channels and after some days, recover local amount in the wallet balance

Actual behaviour

Close channels are in the pending channels and closing transactions hash is not present in the memory pool.

Tell us what happens instead

@AndresCas123 AndresCas123 added bug Unintended code behaviour needs triage labels Jan 31, 2024
@saubyk
Copy link
Collaborator

saubyk commented Feb 1, 2024

Converting this to a discussion...

Advised @AndresCas123 to update LND to the latest version, increase the bitcoin node's mempool size and restart. Closing transaction has been broadcast after those actions were taken as confirmed by the user on the slack thread.
https://lightningcommunity.slack.com/archives/C6AFCN3KL/p1706709848916249

@saubyk saubyk added troubleshooting and removed bug Unintended code behaviour needs triage labels Feb 1, 2024
@lightningnetwork lightningnetwork locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 1, 2024
@saubyk saubyk converted this issue into discussion #8451 Feb 1, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants