You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I really appreciate your wonderful work. But when I run the "segctcent_800w.sh" script, I get much lower Seq_Acc than they are in the paper.
I guess the performance gaps come from the training iteration steps. The scripts (segctcent_800w.sh) says 50 epochs. But in your paper, you says 150 epochs.
Am I right ?
It takes almost two months to finish the 50 epochs training steps. It seems impossible for me to finish the left 100 epochs. So could you please provide the best performance model on Synth90K dataset?
I just want to make a comparison and validate my work. Many thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, I really appreciate your wonderful work. But when I run the "segctcent_800w.sh" script, I get much lower Seq_Acc than they are in the paper.
I guess the performance gaps come from the training iteration steps. The scripts (segctcent_800w.sh) says 50 epochs. But in your paper, you says 150 epochs.
Am I right ?
It takes almost two months to finish the 50 epochs training steps. It seems impossible for me to finish the left 100 epochs. So could you please provide the best performance model on Synth90K dataset?
I just want to make a comparison and validate my work. Many thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: