Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rewrite "host" functionality, replacing it with base url #1591

Closed
cyberw opened this issue Oct 11, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

rewrite "host" functionality, replacing it with base url #1591

cyberw opened this issue Oct 11, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
feature request non-critical stale Issue had no activity. Might still be worth fixing, but dont expect someone else to fix it

Comments

@cyberw
Copy link
Collaborator

cyberw commented Oct 11, 2020

There are a couple of issues with the host parameter functionality:

I suggest:

  • Deprecate --host (and make it non-mandatory)
  • Introduce a --base-url / -b parameter that automatically appends a "/" at the end and supports browser-style "root" urls.

So if base_url is http://x.com/foo

Some special cases:

@lhupfeldt
Copy link
Contributor

Relates to #1467

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Issue had no activity. Might still be worth fixing, but dont expect someone else to fix it label Apr 11, 2021
@cyberw cyberw removed the stale Issue had no activity. Might still be worth fixing, but dont expect someone else to fix it label Apr 11, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Issue had no activity. Might still be worth fixing, but dont expect someone else to fix it label Jun 11, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 10 days with no activity. This does not necessarily mean that the issue is bad, but it most likely means that nobody is willing to take the time to fix it. If you have found Locust useful, then consider contributing a fix yourself!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request non-critical stale Issue had no activity. Might still be worth fixing, but dont expect someone else to fix it
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants