Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Least Used Collector #17

Open
codyja opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Least Used Collector #17

codyja opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@codyja
Copy link

codyja commented May 31, 2019

It would be fantastic if the logicmonitor_collectors datasource could also be configured to lookup collectors that are "least used". This way it could return collectors that are used the least amount automatically. It looks like there is a numOfHosts field that could be used for this logic. Thanks!

https://www.logicmonitor.com/support/rpc-api-developers-guide/manage-device-groups/get-device-groups/#getHostGroupChildren

@pyang55
Copy link
Contributor

pyang55 commented May 31, 2019

@codyja thank you for the excellent suggestion. In the near future we will have an update which will feature our load balanced collector group. This will probably alleviate alot of the concerns about assigning devices to collectors that are over capacity

@codyja
Copy link
Author

codyja commented May 31, 2019

Oooh that sounds perfect. Would that update be in the terraform LM provider, or on the LM side?

@fdevans
Copy link

fdevans commented May 31, 2019

Auto Balanced Collectors is already released! Here's the docs:
https://www.logicmonitor.com/support/settings/collectors/auto-balanced-collector-groups/

I haven't tested it using Terraform yet and we might make some improvements to streamline using it, but the option is there.

@pyang55
Copy link
Contributor

pyang55 commented May 31, 2019

@codyja it is on our new go sdk. However the provider has not been updated yet

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants