-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make the factory HTTP framework function configurable #1290
Comments
Rejecting as the acceptance criteria is not clear enough. What is the 'options object'? |
Dropping from dp3 from our agreed consensus in our estimation meeting |
Removed from 4.0 GA scope, added to [EPIC] REST layer improvements (post-GA) #1452 |
This issue has been marked stale because it has not seen activity within six months. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the |
This issue has been closed due to continued inactivity. Thank you for your understanding. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the |
Description / Steps to reproduce / Feature proposal
Make the factory HTTP framework function (
express()
) configurable and switchable with other Express-compatible frameworksCurrent Behavior
None
Expected Behavior
#1255 (comment)
Acceptance Criteria
LB4 should accept an options object to configure the underlying HTTP framework.
See Reporting Issues for more tips on writing good issues
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: