About how to help merge PRs

[pplam]

Hi @m-novikov , is there something I can do to help merging PRs more efficiently? Please let me know if you have any feedback or suggestions :)

[m-novikov]

This mostly question of my personal time :) I'll plan to review and merge your PRs by the end of this week.
As I don't have too much time and don't want to block you I'll probably add comments and merge them regardless creating follow up issues.
I also wanted to ask what is your use case for the project, because I plan to introduce some changes while working on #42

[m-novikov]

I merged a couple some PRs, please rebase existing to the latest main.

[pplam]

Thanks for your time @m-novikov , I will do it tomorrow

[pplam]

This mostly question of my personal time :) I'll plan to review and merge your PRs by the end of this week. As I don't have too much time and don't want to block you I'll probably add comments and merge them regardless creating follow up issues. I also wanted to ask what is your use case for the project, because I plan to introduce some changes while working on #42

I already understand your situation, I also work here on weekdays, so my PRs will be quite a lot :)

My use case is to parse real-world SQL files then do some analysis on the parse tree. So I'd like to make contributions to make it support as more PostgreSQL grammar as possible, and produce better parse tree and less parse errors.

And by now, I mainly follow the grammar defined in PostgreSQL's docs.

By the way, the ideas described in #42 are great, I fully support such a plan.

[pplam]

Hi @m-novikov

I just rebased #40, #41 and #43 , please help review again at your convenient, thanks!