Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump Datepicker in Catalog Price Rule #26289

Closed
hitesh-wagento opened this issue Jan 7, 2020 · 12 comments
Closed

Jump Datepicker in Catalog Price Rule #26289

hitesh-wagento opened this issue Jan 7, 2020 · 12 comments
Assignees
Labels
Component: Backend Component: CatalogRule Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch Issue: Clear Description Gate 2 Passed. Manual verification of the issue description passed Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch

Comments

@hitesh-wagento
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Jump Datepicker in Catalog Price Rule

Preconditions

  1. Magento 2x - This issue reproduce in all version.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Login to Backend
  2. Go to Marketing => Promotions => Catalog Price Rule
  3. Click on Datepicker

Expected result

  1. Datepicker does not jump in Catalog Price Rule
    expected

Actual result

  1. Jump Datepicker in Catalog Price Rule
    actual
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Jan 7, 2020

Hi @hitesh-wagento. Thank you for your report.
To help us process this issue please make sure that you provided the following information:

  • Summary of the issue
  • Information on your environment
  • Steps to reproduce
  • Expected and actual results

Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:

@magento give me 2.4-develop instance - upcoming 2.4.x release

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.

@hitesh-wagento do you confirm that you were able to reproduce the issue on vanilla Magento instance following steps to reproduce?

  • yes
  • no

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed label Jan 7, 2020
@hitesh-wagento hitesh-wagento self-assigned this Jan 7, 2020
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Jan 7, 2020

Hi @hitesh-wagento. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!


@hitesh-wagento
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am working on this issue.

@hitesh-wagento hitesh-wagento added Component: Backend Issue: Clear Description Gate 2 Passed. Manual verification of the issue description passed labels Jan 7, 2020
@ajijshekh123 ajijshekh123 self-assigned this Jan 7, 2020
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Jan 7, 2020

Hi @ajijshekh123. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

  • 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@ajijshekh123
Copy link

Give me @magento give me 2.4-develop instance

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ajijshekh123. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento 2.4-develop instance for you

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ajijshekh123, here is your Magento instance.
Admin access: https://i-26289-2-4-develop.instances.magento-community.engineering/admin
Login: admin Password: 123123q
Instance will be terminated in up to 3 hours.

@ajijshekh123
Copy link

@hitesh-wagento - This is a UI effect not an issue.

@hitesh-wagento
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hitesh-wagento - This is a UI effect not an issue.

But it looks like issue not UI effect.

@ajijshekh123
Copy link

Okay @hitesh-wagento

@ajijshekh123 ajijshekh123 added Component: CatalogRule Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch labels Jan 7, 2020
@ghost ghost unassigned ajijshekh123 Jan 7, 2020
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Confirmed by @ajijshekh123
Thank you for verifying the issue. Based on the provided information internal tickets MC-30247 were created

Issue Available: @ajijshekh123, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development label Jan 7, 2020
@VladimirZaets VladimirZaets added the Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch label Jan 9, 2020
@VladimirZaets
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hitesh-wagento. Thank you for your report.
The issue has been fixed in #26290 by @hitesh-wagento in 2.4-develop branch
Related commit(s):

The fix will be available with the upcoming 2.4.0 release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Backend Component: CatalogRule Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch Issue: Clear Description Gate 2 Passed. Manual verification of the issue description passed Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants