You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
See above issues with setting the random seed in nlm_fBm
Setting the mean value of the field doesn't work because of the line pred_raster <- pred_raster - raster::cellStats(pred_raster, "min"). Is there a purpose for this line of code? Removing this produces Gaussian random field surfaces with the given mean.
Add lower = 0 to the checks for resolution, mag_var and nug
Some additions to the documentation could improve the usability of this function. I would recommend further explanation of what each of the variance parameters do, in a way that the implications for the generated surface can be interpreted. My understanding of these are that:
mag_var sets the variation of the broad landscape
nug sets the variation within the scale of autocorr_range: low nug values will produce a highly spatially autocorrelated surface and high nug values a rougher surface.
Missing a reference, which would be useful for users to get a better understanding of how this function works.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ropensci/software-review#188 (comment):
See above issues with setting the random seed in nlm_fBm
Setting the mean value of the field doesn't work because of the line pred_raster <- pred_raster - raster::cellStats(pred_raster, "min"). Is there a purpose for this line of code? Removing this produces Gaussian random field surfaces with the given mean.
Add lower = 0 to the checks for resolution, mag_var and nug
Some additions to the documentation could improve the usability of this function. I would recommend further explanation of what each of the variance parameters do, in a way that the implications for the generated surface can be interpreted. My understanding of these are that:
mag_var sets the variation of the broad landscape
nug sets the variation within the scale of autocorr_range: low nug values will produce a highly spatially autocorrelated surface and high nug values a rougher surface.
Missing a reference, which would be useful for users to get a better understanding of how this function works.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: