-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Avoid brand new rooms in delete_old_current_state_events
#7854
Conversation
When considering rooms to clean up in `delete_old_current_state_events`, skip rooms which we are creating, which otherwise look a bit like rooms we have left. Fixes #7834.
# exclude rooms where we have active members | ||
sql = """ | ||
SELECT room_id | ||
FROM current_state_events | ||
FROM local_current_membership | ||
WHERE | ||
room_id > ? AND room_id <= ? | ||
AND type = 'm.room.member' | ||
AND membership = 'join' | ||
AND state_key LIKE ? | ||
GROUP BY room_id | ||
""" | ||
|
||
txn.execute(sql, (last_room_id, room_ids[-1], "%:" + self.server_name)) | ||
|
||
txn.execute(sql, (last_room_id, room_ids[-1])) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these changes are unrelated, but I thought I may as well simplify it while I was here.
creating_rooms = to_delete.difference(row[0] for row in txn) | ||
logger.info("skipping rooms which are being deleted: %s", creating_rooms) | ||
|
||
left_rooms = set(room_ids) - joined_room_ids | ||
to_delete.difference_update(creating_rooms) | ||
|
||
logger.info("Deleting current state left rooms: %r", left_rooms) | ||
logger.info("Deleting current state left rooms: %r", to_delete) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to walk through the logic here:
- The returned rooms are ones that have forward extremities that are not the create event (i.e. they are rooms that are not being created currently).
to_delete
is modified to remove the above, meaning we're left with the rooms that are being created (saved ascreating_rooms
).to_delete
is modified to removecreating_rooms
, leaving only the rooms which are not being currently created. (I think this is equivalent to the intersection of the result of step 1 andto_delete
at the time of step 1, but that doesn't give you something nice to log, unfortunately.)
Not sure if it matters much, but I find the set operations easier to read using operators, e.g. to_delete -= creating_rooms
(although this only works if they're both sets, I think).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, your logic is correct.
I'll add some comments to clarify.
Not sure if it matters much, but I find the set operations easier to read using operators, e.g. to_delete -= creating_rooms (although this only works if they're both sets, I think).
agreed, and the fact that some of these aren't sets is the reason I had to use the wordy version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The added comments look great! 👍
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <[email protected]>
* commit 'a973bcb8a': Add some tiny type annotations (#7870) Remove obsolete comment. Ensure that calls to `json.dumps` are compatible with the standard library json. (#7836) Avoid brand new rooms in `delete_old_current_state_events` (#7854) Allow accounts to be re-activated from the admin APIs. (#7847) Fix tests Fix typo Newsfile Use get_users_in_room rather than state handler in typing for speed Fix client reader sharding tests (#7853) Convert E2E key and room key handlers to async/await. (#7851) Return the proper 403 Forbidden error during errors with JWT logins. (#7844) remove `retry_on_integrity_error` wrapper for persist_events (#7848)
When considering rooms to clean up in
delete_old_current_state_events
, skip rooms which we are creating, which otherwise look a bit like rooms we have left.Fixes #7834.