Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(taps): Use CursorResult.mappings() in SQL streams #2095

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

edgarrmondragon
Copy link
Collaborator

@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon commented Dec 8, 2023

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 8, 2023

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2095 will not alter performance

Comparing edgar/refactor/use-mappings-all (981f926) with main (93ed07a)

Summary

✅ 6 untouched benchmarks

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5293f50) 87.72% compared to head (981f926) 87.72%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2095   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.72%   87.72%           
=======================================
  Files          60       60           
  Lines        4946     4946           
  Branches     1007     1007           
=======================================
  Hits         4339     4339           
  Misses        425      425           
  Partials      182      182           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2023 19:12
@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon merged commit a99eb9f into main Dec 8, 2023
30 checks passed
@edgarrmondragon edgarrmondragon deleted the edgar/refactor/use-mappings-all branch December 8, 2023 19:43
edgarrmondragon added a commit to MeltanoLabs/tap-postgres that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2023
~This was fixed upstream in meltano/sdk#1487,
but this tap overrides `get_records`.~

I think meltano/sdk#2094 is the only difference
between the two implementations?

UPDATE: Using the private `._mapping` attribute makes me nervous so I
opened meltano/sdk#2095 and updated this PR.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant