Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scientific notation #871

Closed
TheCoderAS opened this issue Dec 14, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Scientific notation #871

TheCoderAS opened this issue Dec 14, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@TheCoderAS
Copy link

Problem Statement

Evidence or User Insights

Proposal

Goals

Non-Goals

Low-Fidelity Concept

Requested Assignment

If possible, I would like to implement this.
I'm just suggesting this idea. I don't want to implement it.

@grochocki grochocki added the needs more info Issue requires more information from poster label Dec 15, 2019
@grochocki
Copy link
Contributor

@Aalok766626 - thanks for the contribution, but can you add some more details about what you are proposing here? We already support scientific notation. This is automatic when numbers get too big or too small in Standard and Scientific modes, but there is also a way change this option manually as well:

image

@MicrosoftIssueBot
Copy link
Collaborator

This is your friendly Microsoft Issue Bot. I've seen this issue come in and have gone to tell a human about it.

@MovGP0
Copy link

MovGP0 commented Aug 7, 2020

I guess he want's the presentation to look more like

image

@grochocki
Copy link
Contributor

Rendering rich math expressions is covered by #620. @TheCoderAS, I am going to close this issue for now, but feel free to file a new issue if the comment above or #620 does not cover what you are looking for.

@ghost ghost removed the needs more info Issue requires more information from poster label Aug 11, 2020
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 3, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants