You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm asking this mostly out of curiosity, not to debate the choice of license!
It seems that when this project was started, LICENSEwas added with CC BY 4.0. Creative Commons licenses are pretty unusual for an open source project, so I'm wondering if there's any particular reason for this?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I'm asking this mostly out of curiosity, not to debate the choice of license!
It seems that when this project was started,
LICENSEwas added with CC BY 4.0. Creative Commons licenses are pretty unusual for an open source project, so I'm wondering if there's any particular reason for this?(An MIT
LICENSE-CODEwas also initially added, but it was removed soon after.)Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions