Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement support for WinGet Repair in COM API #4246

Closed
denelon opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Implement support for WinGet Repair in COM API #4246

denelon opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Area-COM-API Issue related to COM API Issue-Feature This is a feature request for the Windows Package Manager client.
Milestone
1.9 Client

Comments

@denelon
Copy link
Contributor

denelon commented Mar 6, 2024

Description of the new feature / enhancement

I want to be able to leverage "Repair" in Dev Home and other applications integrating with WinGet via COM APIs.

Proposed technical implementation details

No response
@denelon denelon added Issue-Feature This is a feature request for the Windows Package Manager client. Area-COM-API Issue related to COM API labels Mar 6, 2024
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Needs-Triage Issue need to be triaged and removed Needs-Triage Issue need to be triaged labels Mar 6, 2024
@denelon denelon added this to the 1.8 Client milestone Mar 6, 2024
@denelon denelon modified the milestones: 1.8 Client, 1.9 Client Jul 3, 2024
@Madhusudhan-MSFT Madhusudhan-MSFT mentioned this issue Oct 8, 2024
Merged
2 tasks
@denelon
Copy link
Contributor Author

denelon commented Oct 8, 2024

@denelon denelon closed this as completed Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Area-COM-API Issue related to COM API Issue-Feature This is a feature request for the Windows Package Manager client.
Projects
WinGet
Status: Done
Milestone
1.9 Client
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@denelon