You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Now in milvus, weighted ranker need to do normolization first, in order to combine different metric types from multi-recall ways.
However, in some embedding models like bge-m3, mgte. They do not need this normolization and they can plus the distance directly.
Describe the solution you'd like.
Add a param in rerank to control whether need do normalization or not.
Describe an alternate solution.
No response
Anything else? (Additional Context)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Now in milvus, weighted ranker need to do normolization first, in order to combine different metric types from multi-recall ways. However, in some embedding models like bge-m3, mgte. They do not need this normolization and they can plus the distance directly.
Describe the solution you'd like.
Add a param in rerank to control whether need do normalization or not.
Describe an alternate solution.
No response
Anything else? (Additional Context)
No response
this means their vector distance is already normalized.
No matter what kind of normalization you do the result won't change.
There is not need to add extra complexity to the api
Is there an existing issue for this?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Now in milvus, weighted ranker need to do normolization first, in order to combine different metric types from multi-recall ways.
However, in some embedding models like bge-m3, mgte. They do not need this normolization and they can plus the distance directly.
Describe the solution you'd like.
Add a param in rerank to control whether need do normalization or not.
Describe an alternate solution.
No response
Anything else? (Additional Context)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: