Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace syn.js #5

Open
uuf6429 opened this issue Jul 1, 2023 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #6
Open

Replace syn.js #5

uuf6429 opened this issue Jul 1, 2023 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #6
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@uuf6429
Copy link
Member

uuf6429 commented Jul 1, 2023

If possible, use selenium action api for all cases.

If not, consider using a syn alternative (or if to complex, depend on syn) for old selenium.

@uuf6429 uuf6429 mentioned this issue Jul 1, 2023
6 tasks
@stof
Copy link
Member

stof commented Jul 1, 2023

We could also make those methods unsupported if we cannot implement them without Syn. In practice, methods implemented with syn are only partially implemented (for instance, I'm not sure focus() actually moves the focus to the element before simulating a focus event)

@uuf6429
Copy link
Member Author

uuf6429 commented Jul 2, 2023

(for instance, I'm not sure focus() actually moves the focus to the element before simulating a focus event)

I can only say that it worked well for focus-triggered pseudoelements - e.g. I've used it to display and test custom tooltips based on elementToBeFocus:focus::after. But I agree with the rest of the sentiment.

@uuf6429 uuf6429 linked a pull request Mar 7, 2024 that will close this issue
@uuf6429 uuf6429 added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants