We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Would the interface be cleaner if the Execute() method returned error instead of a status code. Might be easier for testscript-based testing.
Execute()
error
testscript
Also wouldn't require two CheckClose helpers, added in #33.
CheckClose
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Would the interface be cleaner if the
Execute()
method returnederror
instead of a status code. Might be easier fortestscript
-based testing.Also wouldn't require two
CheckClose
helpers, added in #33.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: