Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 21, 2023. It is now read-only.

Consider documenting reviewer strategy #29

Open
mcomella opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Consider documenting reviewer strategy #29

mcomella opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@mcomella
Copy link
Contributor

mcomella commented Aug 1, 2018

All marked reviewers should generally review; all PRs should have a reviewer specified before being reviewed. If there is no reviewer specified, someone should specify a reviewer (themselves or otherwise).

Also, turn-around time expectations? Maybe not to avoid mismatched expectations in crunch time.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant