Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to restore the ideal accuracy(mAP) by fine-tuning #6

Open
Lawrencechengsjtu opened this issue Mar 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

How to restore the ideal accuracy(mAP) by fine-tuning #6

Lawrencechengsjtu opened this issue Mar 28, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@Lawrencechengsjtu
Copy link

Hi author! Thx for ur sharing!

I was just trying your iterative compression algorithms using vbmf for compressing the faster rcnn model (exactly the same code mentioned in your paper), but i found it great difficulty doing the fine-tuning work. The more layers I compressed, the less mAP it achieved. Finally, it is approximately 8~10 points lost, which is far below your performance.

Can u tell me how I should do the fine-tuning part better? (like dataset, lr, epoch, etc.) Or can u tell me some of your opinions in terms of it? Thank u!

@Lawrencechengsjtu
Copy link
Author

@juliagusak

@cszer
Copy link

cszer commented May 25, 2020

  1. compress backbone predtrained on imagenet firstly after fine tune on imagenet , it's most computational part of every detector. I think it's more appropriate approach

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants