You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Making wind climatology from many VV and HH images, I find that HH-wind is clearly too high, by almost 2 m/s in average(!)
This is probably due to limitation of the simple Thompson1998 polarisation ratio (though cannot ignore the possibility of a bug somewhere). Note that that polarisation has been developed for Radarsat data, and pol ratio is probably sensor specific in practice (though it should not in theory).
The polarisation ratio function of Mouche2005 (below) should be used/tested instead, as this is newer, and is developed for ASAR data.
This one depends on wind direction also, so it can only be implemented after wind direction information has been added to the object.
Making wind climatology from many VV and HH images, I find that HH-wind is clearly too high, by almost 2 m/s in average(!)
This is probably due to limitation of the simple Thompson1998 polarisation ratio (though cannot ignore the possibility of a bug somewhere). Note that that polarisation has been developed for Radarsat data, and pol ratio is probably sensor specific in practice (though it should not in theory).
The polarisation ratio function of Mouche2005 (below) should be used/tested instead, as this is newer, and is developed for ASAR data.
This one depends on wind direction also, so it can only be implemented after wind direction information has been added to the object.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: