Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

go get fail on Go 1.13 #522

Closed
uudashr opened this issue Sep 17, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

go get fail on Go 1.13 #522

uudashr opened this issue Sep 17, 2019 · 7 comments

Comments

@uudashr
Copy link

uudashr commented Sep 17, 2019

Trying to go get but fail

$ go get github.com/nats-io/nats.go
stat github.com/nats-io/nats.go: no such file or directory

Try to use the latest but no luck

$ go get github.com/nats-io/nats.go/@latest
go get github.com/nats-io/nats.go/@latest: malformed module path "github.com/nats-io/nats.go/": trailing slash

For version 1.8.1, also failed

$ go get github.com/nats-io/nats.go/@v1.8.1
go: finding github.com v1.8.1
go: finding github.com/nats-io v1.8.1
go get github.com/nats-io/nats.go/@v1.8.1: malformed module path "github.com/nats-io/nats.go/": trailing slash

My go version: go version go1.13 darwin/amd64

Any idea why?

@derekcollison
Copy link
Member

golang/go#32483

Need to wait for 1.13.1

Fix is on master for golang already.

@wallyqs wallyqs pinned this issue Sep 17, 2019
@wallyqs wallyqs changed the title go get fail go get fail on Go 1.13 Sep 17, 2019
@sweetgiorni
Copy link

Updated to 1.13.1 and I still see this issue:

bash-4.2# go version
go version go1.13.1 linux/amd64

bash-4.2# go get github.com/nats-io/nats.go
stat github.com/nats-io/nats.go: no such file or directory

@derekcollison
Copy link
Member

Yes, 1.13.1 was only a security release. 1.13.2, hopefully this week, will fix all of the projects that use a .go extension for the repo name.

@sweetgiorni
Copy link

Bah, I was excited to try out NATS :)
Guess I'll wait

@derekcollison
Copy link
Member

We recommend waiting for 1.13.2 for all Go stuff TBH.

@kozlovic
Copy link
Member

kozlovic commented Oct 8, 2019

But I guess you could clone right? You don't have to do go get to have a try :-)

@sweetgiorni
Copy link

That is an astute observation.
Bytes/Sec: 416.8M
Oooweee that's fast!

@wallyqs wallyqs unpinned this issue Oct 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants