You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The test introduced in #1752 did not pass when the NVIDIA HPC compilers nvc and nvc++ were used. #1822 was introduced to make the tests pass by tolerating larger differences.
# Note the very large tolerance, this seems relatively unstable with the
# NVIDIA compilers
chk(key+" tvec size", tvec.size(), tol=0.25)
seem worthy of further investigation. Differences between compilers are to be expected at some level, but this seems high.
See the discussion on the follow-up PR here: #1822 (comment).
Expected result/behaviour
The results obtained with the NVIDIA compilers should be compatible with those obtained with GCC/Intel/Clang with a margin that is plausibly related to optimisations (e.g. FMA and enabled fast-math optimisations).
Assuming the difference is understood and fixed at source, the test tolerance should be reduced again.
NEURON setup
Version: master
Installation method: CMake build
OS + Version: BB5
Compiler + Version: NVHPC 22.3
Minimal working example - MWE
Modify the tolerance linked above to be smaller again, run the relevant test and investigate its failure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I did not succeed in installing a working nvcc/nvc++ on my desktop (cuda refused to install). What is the name of the BB5 these days. Last time I logged in it was [email protected]. I guess I'm out of date with:
Hostname: bbpv1.epfl.ch
User: hines
ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'hpe-mpi'
ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'gcc/6.4.0'
ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/3.6.5
Do I need a list of module loads? And what is a reasonable cmake to look into this issue? If I've entered a minefield, I'm happy to step back.
Context
The test introduced in #1752 did not pass when the NVIDIA HPC compilers
nvc
andnvc++
were used. #1822 was introduced to make the tests pass by tolerating larger differences.Overview of the issue
Some tolerances, in particular this 25% margin:
nrn/test/cover/test_netcvode.py
Lines 569 to 571 in c127b54
seem worthy of further investigation. Differences between compilers are to be expected at some level, but this seems high.
See the discussion on the follow-up PR here: #1822 (comment).
Expected result/behaviour
The results obtained with the NVIDIA compilers should be compatible with those obtained with GCC/Intel/Clang with a margin that is plausibly related to optimisations (e.g. FMA and enabled fast-math optimisations).
Assuming the difference is understood and fixed at source, the test tolerance should be reduced again.
NEURON setup
Minimal working example - MWE
Modify the tolerance linked above to be smaller again, run the relevant test and investigate its failure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: