You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we have to be very careful when tiling our matmul that the inner loop has the right matmul shape and striding, otherwise the numerics go haywire.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This task description needs improvement but essentially we should do these in order:
Improve error messages for cases we don't currently support (example: inner-most tiling of operands not having 64 elements each),
improve set of supported cases: different strides, smaller tiles in core memory, etc.
This is related to issue: Xilinx/mlir-aie#1478
Currently we have to be very careful when tiling our matmul that the inner loop has the right matmul shape and striding, otherwise the numerics go haywire.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: